Negative News Screening

​

Apple Inc. (AAPL)

• Negative sentiment due to analyst downgrades and iPhone/China concerns.
• Recent earnings positive, but growth expectations weigh on stock.
• No major ESG controversies reported recently.

​

Tesla Inc. (TSLA)

• Declining US demand due to CEO’s image and safety issues.
• Slowing growth, price cuts, and poor stock performance.
• No major ESG controversies reported recently, but concerns over Musk and environmental impact exist.

​

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)

• No recent negative news or ESG controversies.
• Past criticism for controversial deals and handling of 2008 crisis, but no recent reports.

​

Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

• Q1 revenue decline due to operations and currency impact.
• Oncology biosimilar revenue down due to lower US pricing.
• Maintained 2024 revenue guidance, raised adjusted EPS guidance.
• No major ESG controversies reported recently, but past criticism for pricing practices and opioid crisis exists.

​

Walmart Inc. (WMT)

• Internal system failure in March caused mispricing at stores.
• Widespread criticism and lower share prices due to the issue.
• No major ESG controversies reported recently, but past criticism for labor practices and community impact exists.

​

ExxonMobil Corp. (XOM)

• Investor backlash due to legal actions against climate activists.
• Upward earnings estimate revisions for 2024 and 2025.
• Strong Zacks Style Score for Value and Momentum.

​

Meta Platforms Inc. (META)

• No specific negative news or ESG controversies reported recently, but past criticism for user data and mental health impact exists.

​

Airbus SE (AIR)

• No specific negative news or ESG controversies reported recently, but past criticism for arms deals and environmental impact exists.

​

Disney (DIS)

• No specific negative news or ESG controversies reported recently, but past criticism for labor practices and sexual misconduct allegations exists.

​

General Electric (GE)

• No specific negative news or ESG controversies reported recently, but past criticism for pension obligations and controversial deals exists.

• ExxonMobil sues investor groups Follow This and Arjuna Capital over a shareholder vote on emission reduction measures.
• The proposal aimed to accelerate emission reductions and require targets for “Scope 3” emissions (emissions from a company’s value chain).
• The lawsuit alleges investor tactics aim to silence voices and disrupt shareholder democracy.
• Investors view climate change as a threat to long-term investment and argue ExxonMobil’s lawsuit could negatively impact corporate governance.
• The investors withdrew the proposal after the lawsuit was filed.
• CEO Darren Woods vows to protect annual meetings from “serial attacks” by activists.
• The company accuses investors of a “Trojan horse” strategy to deliberately harm the company.
• The lawsuit’s outcome could impact corporate governance and shareholder influence on ESG issues.
• The case highlights the growing tension between companies and activist investors over ESG agendas and shareholder proposals.

• ExxonMobil’s lawsuit against climate activists raises concerns about its relationship with investors and reputation.
• Increased investor focus on ESG issues could negatively impact companies perceived as lacking in accountability and proactive climate action.
• Geopolitical tensions and instability could disrupt trade, cause political instability, and disrupt supply chains, impacting the global economy and markets.
• Debate on shareholder rights and corporate responsibility related to climate change could lead to increased regulation and compliance costs for companies, especially those reliant on fossil fuels.
• The specific outcome and broader market impact of the ExxonMobil controversy depend on the legal interpretation and situation details.
• This case highlights the importance of companies addressing ESG issues and the potential consequences for inaction.