In today’s rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, staying ahead of emerging compliance risks is essential for informed decision-making across the technology sector. This workflow showcases an automated analysis system that integrates advanced information retrieval using the Bigdata.comAPI with large language model (LLM) analysis to generate comprehensive regulatory intelligence reports for a watchlist of technology companies.
The system automatically analyzes three types of corporate documents (news articles, SEC filings, and earnings transcripts) to provide both sector-wide regulatory trends and company-specific risk assessments with quantitative scoring metrics.
This automated framework systematically evaluates regulatory issues across multiple dimensions:
Quantitative Scoring System:
Media Attention Score: Volume and intensity of regulatory coverage in news sources
Risk/Financial Impact Score: Potential business and financial implications of regulatory issues
Uncertainty Score: Level of ambiguity and unpredictability around regulatory outcomes
Dual-Level Intelligence:
Sector-Wide Analysis: Cross-industry regulatory trends and themes across technology domains (AI, Social Media, Hardware & Chips, E-commerce, Advertising)
Company-Specific Insights: Individual company risk profiles, mitigation strategies, and regulatory responses
The analysis leverages the GenerateReport class, which orchestrates the entire process from data retrieval to final report generation, providing actionable insights for compliance officers, risk managers, and investment decisions focused on the designated company watchlist.
The Report Generator workflow follows these steps:
Generate comprehensive regulatory theme trees across different technology focus areas to ensure thorough coverage of regulatory landscapes
Retrieve the universe of relevant companies from the predefined watchlist to analyze for regulatory exposure
For each company in the selected group, use the Bigdata to search for news, filings and transcripts related to regulatory issues across specified technology domains
Categorize the relevance of each document using LLM-based analysis and filter out non-relevant content to ensure high-quality insights
Summarize regulatory challenges and generate comprehensive scoring metrics including Media Attention, Risk/Financial Impact, and Uncertainty levels for each company
Analyze company filings and transcripts to identify and summarize proactive mitigation strategies and regulatory responses
Create the final report covering sector-wide issues and company-specific regulatory challenges with actionable insights
This notebook demonstrates how to implement this workflow, transforming unstructured regulatory information into structured, decision-ready intelligence for regulatory risk assessment within a curated set of technology companies.
The Report Generator requires API credentials for both the Bigdata API and the LLM API (in this case, OpenAI). Make sure you have these credentials available as environment variables or in a secure credential store.
Never hardcode credentials directly in your notebook or scripts.
Copy
Ask AI
# Secure way to access credentialsfrom google.colab import userdataBIGDATA_USERNAME = userdata.get('BIGDATA_USERNAME')BIGDATA_PASSWORD = userdata.get('BIGDATA_PASSWORD')# Set environment variables for any new client instancesos.environ["BIGDATA_USERNAME"] = BIGDATA_USERNAMEos.environ["BIGDATA_PASSWORD"] = BIGDATA_PASSWORD# Use them in your codebigdata = Bigdata(BIGDATA_USERNAME, BIGDATA_PASSWORD)OPENAI_API_KEY = userdata.get('OPENAI_API_KEY')os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = OPENAI_API_KEY
Watchlist (my_watchlist_id): The set of companies to analyze. This is the ID of your watchlist in the watchlist section of the app.
Model Selection (llm_model): The LLM model used to label search result document chunks and generate summaries
Frequency (search_frequency): The frequency of the date ranges to search over.
Supported values:
Y: Yearly intervals
M: Monthly intervals
W: Weekly intervals
D: Daily intervals. Defaults to 3M
Time Period (start_date and end_date): The date range over which to run the analysis
Focus (focus): Specify a focus within the main theme. This will then be used in building the LLM generated mindmapper
Document Limits (document_limit_news, document_limit_filings, document_limit_transcripts): The maximum number of documents to return per query to Bigdata API for each category of documents
Batch Size (batch_size): The number of entities to include in a single batched query
Copy
Ask AI
# ===== Fixed Parameters =====# General regulatory themegeneral_theme = 'Regulatory Issues'# Specific focus areas within technology sectorslist_specific_focus = ['AI', 'Social Media', 'Hardware and Chips', 'E-commerce', 'Advertising']# ===== Customizable Parameters =====# Company Universe (from Watchlist)my_watchlist_id = "fa589e57-c9e0-444d-801d-18c92d65389f" # Magnificent 7watchlist = bigdata.watchlists.get(my_watchlist_id)companies = bigdata.knowledge_graph.get_entities(watchlist.items)company_names = [company.name for company in companies]# LLM Specificationllm_model = "openai::gpt-4o-mini"# Search Frequencysearch_frequency='M'# Specify Time Rangestart_date="2025-01-01"end_date="2025-04-20"# Document Limitsdocument_limit_news=10document_limit_filings=5document_limit_transcripts=5# Othersbatch_size=1
We initialize the class GenerateReport and in the following section of the notebook, we will go through each step used by this class to generate the report. In the colab notebook you can skip the step-by-step process and directly run the generate_report() method in the section Direct Method.
Mindmap a Theme Taxonomy with Bigdata Research Tools
You can leverage Bigdata Research Tools to generate a comprehensive theme taxonomy with an LLM, breaking down regulatory themes into smaller, well-defined concepts for more targeted analysis across different technology focus areas.
Copy
Ask AI
# Generate the Theme Treethemes_tree_dict = {}for focus in list_specific_focus: theme_tree = generate_theme_tree( main_theme=general_theme, focus=focus ) themes_tree_dict[focus] = theme_treetheme_tree.visualize()
The taxonomy tree includes descriptive sentences that explicitly connect each sub-theme back to the Regulatory Issues general theme, ensuring all search results remain contextually relevant to our central trend.
Copy
Ask AI
# Get all the summaries from all the nodesnode_summaries = theme_tree.get_summaries()
With the theme taxonomy and screening parameters, you can leverage the Bigdata API to run searches on company news, filings, and transcripts across different regulatory focus areas.
Copy
Ask AI
# Run searches on News, Filings, and Transcriptsdf_sentences_news = []df_sentences_filings = []df_sentences_transcripts = []scopes_config = [ (DocumentType.NEWS, document_limit_news, df_sentences_news), (DocumentType.FILINGS, document_limit_filings, df_sentences_filings), (DocumentType.TRANSCRIPTS, document_limit_transcripts, df_sentences_transcripts)]# Search using summariesfor scope, document_limit, df_list in scopes_config: for focus in list_specific_focus: df_sentences = search_by_companies( companies=companies, sentences=list(themes_tree_dict[focus].get_terminal_label_summaries().values()), start_date=start_date, end_date=end_date, scope=scope, freq=search_frequency, document_limit=document_limit, batch_size=batch_size ) df_sentences['theme'] = general_theme + ' in ' + focus df_list.append(df_sentences)# Concatenate resultsdf_sentences_news = pd.concat(df_sentences_news)df_sentences_filings = pd.concat(df_sentences_filings)df_sentences_transcripts = pd.concat(df_sentences_transcripts)
Use an LLM to analyze each document chunk and determine its relevance to the regulatory themes. Any document chunks which aren’t explicitly linked to Regulatory Issues will be filtered out.
Copy
Ask AI
# Label the search results with our theme labelslabeler = ScreenerLabeler(llm_model=llm_model)# Initialize empty lists for labeled datadf_news_labeled = []df_filings_labeled = []df_transcripts_labeled = []# Configure data sourcessources_config = [ (df_sentences_news, df_news_labeled), (df_sentences_filings, df_filings_labeled), (df_sentences_transcripts, df_transcripts_labeled)]for df_sentences, labeled_list in sources_config: for focus in list_specific_focus: df_sentences_theme = df_sentences.loc[(df_sentences.theme == general_theme + ' in ' + focus)] df_sentences_theme.reset_index(drop=True, inplace=True) df_labels = labeler.get_labels( main_theme=general_theme + ' in ' + focus, labels=list(themes_tree_dict[focus].get_terminal_label_summaries().keys()), texts=df_sentences_theme["masked_text"].tolist() ) df_merged_labels = pd.merge(df_sentences_theme, df_labels, left_index=True, right_index=True) labeled_list.append(df_merged_labels)# Concatenate resultsdf_news_labeled = pd.concat(df_news_labeled)df_filings_labeled = pd.concat(df_filings_labeled)df_transcripts_labeled = pd.concat(df_transcripts_labeled)
You can visualize the tables showing the count of different document types for each company in the given universe. This helps you understand the distribution and availability of regulatory information across different sources for each entity.
Copy
Ask AI
def create_styled_table(df, title, companies_list, entity_column='entity_name', document_column='document_type'): import pandas as pd import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Create pivot table pivot_table = df.groupby([entity_column, document_column])['document_id'].nunique().unstack(fill_value=0) pivot_table = pivot_table.reindex(companies_list, fill_value=0) normal_table = pivot_table.reset_index() normal_table.columns.values[0] = 'Company' n_rows = len(normal_table) row_height = 0.4 fig_height = max(2, n_rows * row_height + 1.5) fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, fig_height)) ax.axis('tight') ax.axis('off') table = ax.table(cellText=normal_table.values, colLabels=normal_table.columns, cellLoc='center', loc='center') table.auto_set_font_size(False) table.set_fontsize(10) table.scale(1.2, 2) # Header styling for i in range(len(normal_table.columns)): table[(0, i)].set_facecolor('#4CAF50') table[(0, i)].set_text_props(weight='bold', color='white') # Row striping for i in range(1, len(normal_table) + 1): for j in range(len(normal_table.columns)): table[(i, j)].set_facecolor('#e0e0e0' if i % 2 == 0 else 'white') plt.figtext(0.5, 0.95, title, fontsize=16, fontweight='bold', ha='center') plt.show()
Table for All Retrieved Documents about Regulatory Issues
Copy
Ask AI
df_statistic_resources = pd.concat([df_news_labeled, df_filings_labeled, df_transcripts_labeled])create_styled_table(df_statistic_resources, title='Retrieved Document Count by Company and Document Type', companies_list = company_names)
Table for Relevant Documents about Regulatory Issues
Copy
Ask AI
df_statistic_resources_relevant = df_statistic_resources.loc[~df_statistic_resources.label.isin(['', 'unassigned', 'unclear'])]create_styled_table(df_statistic_resources_relevant, title='Relevant Document Count by Company and Document Type', companies_list = company_names)
The following code is used to create summaries for regulatory themes at both sector-wide and company-specific levels using the information from the retrieved documents.
Copy
Ask AI
# Run the process to summarize the documents and compute media attention by topic, sector-widesummarizer_sector = TopicSummarizerSector( model=llm_model.split('::')[1], api_key=OPENAI_API_KEY, df_labeled=df_news_labeled, general_theme=general_theme, list_specific_focus=list_specific_focus, themes_tree_dict=themes_tree_dict, logger=GenerateReport.logger)df_by_theme = summarizer_sector.summarize()# Run the process to summarize the documents and score media attention, risk and uncertainty by topic at company levelsummarizer_company = TopicSummarizerCompany( model=llm_model.split('::')[1], api_key=OPENAI_API_KEY, logger=GenerateReport.logger, verbose=True)df_by_company = asyncio.run( summarizer_company.process_topic_by_company( df_labeled=df_news_labeled, list_entities=companies ))
Extract company mitigation strategies and regulatory responses from filings and transcripts to understand how companies are proactively addressing regulatory challenges.
Copy
Ask AI
# Concatenate Filings and Transcripts dataframesdf_filings_labeled['doc_type'] = 'Filings'df_transcripts_labeled['doc_type'] = 'Transcripts'df_ft_labeled = pd.concat([df_filings_labeled, df_transcripts_labeled])df_ft_labeled = df_ft_labeled.reset_index(drop=True)# Run the process to extract company's mitigation plan from the documents (filings and transcripts)response_processor = CompanyResponseProcessor( model=llm_model.split('::')[1], api_key=OPENAI_API_KEY, logger=GenerateReport.logger, verbose=True)df_response_by_company = asyncio.run( response_processor.process_response_by_company( df_labeled=df_ft_labeled, df_by_company=df_by_company, list_entities=companies ))# Merge the companies responses to the dataframe with issue summaries and scoresdf_by_company_with_responses = pd.merge(df_by_company, df_response_by_company, on=['entity_id', 'entity_name', 'topic'], how='left')df_by_company_with_responses['filings_response_summary'] = df_by_company_with_responses['response_summary']# Extract the company's mitigation plan for each regulatory issue from the News documentsdf_news_response_by_company = asyncio.run( response_processor.process_response_by_company( df_labeled=df_news_labeled, df_by_company=df_by_company, list_entities=companies ))df_news_response_by_company = df_news_response_by_company.rename( columns={'response_summary': 'news_response_summary', 'n_response_documents': 'news_n_response_documents'})df_by_company_with_responses = pd.merge(df_by_company_with_responses, df_news_response_by_company, on=['entity_id', 'entity_name', 'topic'], how='left')report_by_theme = df_by_themereport_by_company = df_by_company_with_responses
The following code provides an example of how the final regulatory issues report can be formatted, ranking topics based on their Media Attention, Risk/Financial Impact, and Uncertainty.
You can customize the ranking system by specifying the number of top themes to display with user_selected_nb_topics_themes.
Copy
Ask AI
# Generate the html reporttop_by_theme, top_by_company = prepare_data_report_0( df_by_theme = df_by_theme, df_by_company_with_responses = df_by_company_with_responses, user_selected_nb_topics_themes = 3,)html_content = generate_html_report(top_by_theme, top_by_company, 'Regulatory Issues in the Tech Sector')with open(output_dir+'/report.html', 'w') as file: file.write(html_content)display(HTML(html_content))
Report: Regulatory Issues in the Tech Sector
Sector-Wide Issues
Regulatory investigations into AI practices are intensifying globally, with significant scrutiny from U.S. and EU authorities targeting major tech firms like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta for potential antitrust violations, data misuse, and compliance with new AI regulations. Notably, the EU’s AI Act, effective August 2024, imposes strict risk-based regulations on AI technologies, while the U.S. FTC is investigating partnerships that may hinder competition. Additionally, the Chinese AI startup DeepSeek is under investigation for potential violations of U.S. export restrictions, raising concerns about the integrity of AI supply chains.
Numerous class action lawsuits have emerged against AI companies like OpenAI and Meta, primarily focusing on allegations of copyright infringement for using copyrighted materials without permission to train AI models. Notable cases include The New York Times’ lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft filed in December 2023, and ongoing lawsuits from authors such as Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehisi Coates against Meta for similar violations. These legal challenges highlight the growing tension between AI development and the rights of content creators, with potential implications for future regulatory frameworks in the AI sector.
The U.S. tech industry is voicing strong opposition to proposed export restrictions on AI chips, warning that such regulations could undermine American leadership in AI and benefit international competitors, particularly China. The Biden administration’s recent measures aim to limit access to advanced AI technologies for adversarial nations, with significant implications for major companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Amazon, who face compliance challenges and potential revenue losses. As of early 2024, these export controls are expected to reshape the global tech landscape, with ongoing debates about their effectiveness and impact on U.S. economic interests.
Regulatory investigations into major tech companies, particularly those involving Elon Musk’s businesses, are intensifying, with at least 20 ongoing federal probes into Tesla and SpaceX as of late 2024. Concurrently, the EU is actively pursuing investigations against Apple, Meta, and Google under the Digital Markets Act, with potential fines reaching up to 10% of global revenues, while the U.S. FTC is also scrutinizing Amazon and Microsoft for antitrust violations. These regulatory actions reflect a broader trend of increased oversight on tech giants, particularly in relation to data privacy, competition, and advertising practices.
Recent class action lawsuits highlight significant regulatory issues in advertising, particularly concerning privacy violations and misleading claims. Notably, Apple settled a 95millionlawsuitoverSiri′sallegedunauthorizedrecordingofconversationsfortargetedads,whileMetafacesamulti−billiondollarclassactionforinflatingadreachmetrics,potentiallycostingadvertisersover7 billion. Additionally, Amazon is embroiled in multiple lawsuits for unlawfully collecting geolocation data and misleading consumers about the environmental impact of its products.
Recent reports highlight significant regulatory issues in advertising, particularly concerning misleading claims and consumer protection. Notably, Apple faces lawsuits for allegedly deceptive marketing of its ‘carbon neutral’ Apple Watches and misleading advertisements regarding its AI capabilities, while Meta is scrutinized for promoting illegal products and failing to curb scam ads on its platforms. Additionally, Amazon is challenged over greenwashing allegations related to its paper products and the sale of items to minors, emphasizing the need for transparency and compliance in advertising practices.
Recent reports highlight significant regulatory challenges facing e-commerce giants like Amazon and Flipkart, particularly regarding antitrust lawsuits and compliance with new trade tariffs. In India, investigations revealed that both companies favored select sellers, prompting legal actions and potential changes in marketplace regulations. Additionally, U.S. tariffs on imports, including those from China, are expected to impact Amazon’s supply chain and pricing strategies, with analysts noting that about 25% of its goods sold are sourced from China, raising concerns about increased operational costs and competitive dynamics.
E-commerce companies, particularly major tech firms like Apple, Meta, and Google, face significant legal penalties for regulatory violations in the EU, with fines potentially reaching up to 10% of their global revenue under the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA). Recent reports indicate that Apple was fined EUR 1.8 billion for anti-competitive practices, while Meta has incurred over EUR 2 billion in GDPR fines since 2022. Additionally, the Delhi High Court imposed a USD 39 million penalty on Amazon for trademark infringement, highlighting the increasing scrutiny and legal challenges faced by e-commerce platforms globally.
E-commerce taxation policies are increasingly complex, with various jurisdictions implementing digital service taxes targeting major tech companies like Amazon and Google, as seen in Canada’s retroactive tax effective from 2022, expected to generate $7.2 billion over five years. Additionally, the IRS is tightening regulations on online sales reporting, particularly affecting platforms like eBay and Facebook Marketplace, while countries like India are scrapping digital taxes to ease trade tensions with the U.S. These developments highlight the ongoing regulatory challenges and compliance requirements faced by e-commerce businesses globally.
Company-Specific Issues
Regulatory Issues in E-commerce - E-commerce Trade Regulations:
Amazon.com Inc. faces significant regulatory challenges, including ongoing antitrust lawsuits alleging monopolistic practices in the U.S. and India, scrutiny over compliance with import tariffs and product safety regulations, and potential impacts from new tariffs affecting its supply chain, particularly from China, which could raise operational costs and affect its competitive position in various markets.
Regulatory Issues in E-commerce - E-commerce Trade Regulations:
Regulatory issues, including antitrust lawsuits and potential tariff impacts, pose significant risks to Amazon.com Inc.’s business model and financial performance, particularly due to its reliance on third-party sellers and international supply chains.
Regulatory Issues in E-commerce - E-commerce Trade Regulations:
The outcome of Regulatory Issues in E-commerce - E-commerce Trade Regulations on Amazon.com Inc. is highly uncertain due to ongoing antitrust lawsuits, potential changes in tariff policies, and various regulatory challenges across multiple jurisdictions.
Regulatory Issues in E-commerce - E-commerce Trade Regulations: Amazon.com Inc. is actively addressing regulatory challenges by establishing contractual relationships with local entities in China to comply with foreign investment and cybersecurity regulations, providing marketing and logistics support to third-party sellers in India to navigate ownership restrictions, and vigorously defending against antitrust lawsuits filed by the Federal Trade Commission and state Attorneys General, including ongoing litigation in the W.D. Wash. and the DC Court of Appeals as of September and August 2024, respectively.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations:
Apple Inc. is facing significant regulatory challenges related to its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework, which has drawn scrutiny from various authorities, including a €150 million fine from France for allegedly abusing its dominant position in the mobile apps market, and ongoing investigations in Germany and Brazil, while also navigating new age verification requirements and compliance with the EU’s Digital Markets Act aimed at promoting competition.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations:
Regulatory issues in social media, particularly concerning Apple’s App Tracking Transparency and antitrust scrutiny in Europe, pose a significant financial risk to Apple Inc., potentially leading to substantial fines and operational changes that could impact its revenue.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations:
The outcome of Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations on Apple Inc. is highly uncertain due to ongoing investigations, potential fines, and the evolving regulatory landscape across multiple jurisdictions.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations: Apple Inc. is actively responding to regulatory scrutiny by developing a new ‘Declared Age Range’ API to assist social media apps in age verification while maintaining its commitment to user privacy, despite facing a €150 million fine from France for its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework, which has been criticized for creating an uneven competitive landscape; the company has also expressed concerns that the EU’s Digital Markets Act could jeopardize user privacy, indicating a strategic focus on compliance and adaptation to evolving regulations.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations:
Meta Platforms Inc. is facing significant regulatory challenges, including new draft Digital Personal Data Protection rules requiring parental consent for children’s accounts, ongoing scrutiny and fines under the EU’s GDPR totaling $2.67 billion since 2022, and a landmark antitrust trial regarding its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, all of which could severely impact its business operations and advertising models.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations:
Regulatory issues in social media, particularly concerning data privacy, content moderation, and compliance with new laws, pose significant financial risks to Meta Platforms Inc., as evidenced by ongoing legal challenges, substantial fines, and the potential for operational changes that could impact its advertising revenue.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations:
The outcome of Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations on Meta Platforms Inc. is highly uncertain due to ongoing legal challenges, evolving regulations, and significant scrutiny from various governments and regulatory bodies.
Regulatory Issues in Social Media - Social Media Regulations: Meta Platforms Inc. is actively responding to regulatory challenges by implementing changes to its user data practices, such as transitioning the legal basis for behavioral advertising from ‘legitimate interests’ to ‘consent’ in the EU, offering a ‘subscription for no ads’ alternative since November 2023, and engaging with regulators on compliance with the GDPR and other regulations, while also appealing a EUR 1.2 billion fine imposed by the IDPC for non-compliance with data transfer regulations.
The report provides a detailed analysis of the most relevant sector-wide issues and analyzes individual companies, highlighting three key aspects:
Most Reported Issue: The regulatory topic receiving the highest volume of media coverage
Biggest Risk: The regulatory issue with the highest potential financial and business impact
Most Uncertain Issue: The regulatory matter with the greatest ambiguity and unpredictability
Each aspect is analyzed using its own ranking system, allowing for a tailored and detailed view of company-specific regulatory challenges and their strategic responses.
Export the data as Excel files for further analysis or to share with the team.
Copy
Ask AI
try: # Create the Excel manager excel_manager = ExcelManager() # Define the dataframes and their sheet configurations df_args = [ (df_by_company_with_responses, "Report Regulatory Issues by companies", (2, 3)), (df_by_theme, "Report Regulatory Issues by theme", (1, 1)) ] # Save the workbook excel_manager.save_workbook(df_args, export_path)except Exception as e: print(f"Warning while exporting to excel: {e}")
The Regulatory Issues Report Generator provides a comprehensive automated framework for analyzing regulatory risks and company mitigation strategies across the technology sector. By systematically combining advanced information retrieval with LLM-powered analysis, this workflow transforms unstructured regulatory information into structured, decision-ready intelligence.
Through the automated analysis of regulatory challenges across multiple technology domains, you can:
Analyze regulatory intensity - Compare regulatory scrutiny levels across different technology sectors (AI, Social Media, Hardware & Chips, E-commerce, Advertising) to identify compliance challenges
Assess company-specific risk profiles - Compare how companies within your watchlist are exposed to different regulatory issues using quantitative scoring across Media Attention, Risk/Financial Impact, and Uncertainty dimensions
Monitor proactive compliance strategies - Track how companies are responding to regulatory challenges through their filings, transcripts, and public communications, identifying best practices and strategic approaches
Quantify regulatory uncertainty - The comprehensive scoring system provides clear metrics to identify which regulatory issues pose the greatest ambiguity and unpredictability for strategic planning
Generate sector-wide intelligence - Create comprehensive reports that inform regulatory strategy, compliance planning, and investment decisions across technology companies
Analyze regulatory landscape for specific periods - Generate comprehensive snapshots of regulatory challenges and company responses for defined time periods, enabling informed risk assessment and strategic planning
From conducting regulatory due diligence to building compliance-focused investment strategies or assessing sector-wide regulatory risks, the Report Generator automates the research process while maintaining the depth and nuance required for professional regulatory intelligence. The standardized scoring methodology ensures consistent evaluation across companies, regulatory domains, and time periods, making it an invaluable tool for systematic regulatory risk assessment in the rapidly evolving technology sector.